• Schwim Dandy@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    2 days ago

    If I didn’t enjoy the cat & mouse of it, I’d definitely walk away from running a site. Just out of curiosity, I created an hourly graph today showing malicious bot, legitimate bot and human ratio graphs for one of my sites. The malicious hits make up around 80% hourly and human hits are usually well under 10%.

    image

    • bruh@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      What sorts of measure you have taken to prevent bots from exhausting your compute and bandwidth

      • Schwim Dandy@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Another example expanding on my previous comment.

        This IP from Hong Kong hit my site over 5,000 times in a couple minutes. The first 12 page loads were legitimate URLs and got served. On their first exploit attempt, they were blocked and the remaining 4,98x page loads were no-effort 403s. This type of thing has made it possible for me to have a cheap public-facing site as I wouldn’t be able to afford an endless array of malicious IPs doing this day in and day out. Before I went this route, I would have to shut the site down during high impact periods of these visitors as they’d corrupt and crash the database.

        image

      • Schwim Dandy@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        As soon as an IP is determined to be malicious, subsequent pageloads result in a single query to match the IP and they get dumped to a 403 static error.

        With the bots that hammer a site looking for the top 1,000 or so exploitable URLs or partake in speed scraping, this has worked wonders for my server load. I catch them in their 1st-5th page load and the rest just result in basically no effort on the part of the script.

        image