I’m halfway with you, and halfway just considering that people think it’s relevant to include a tl;dr in a barely three paragraph comment. The feeling with tl;dr for me is a summary similar to a closing paragraph, and if anyone thinks that one sentence (“Ai coding can help a lot in accelerating software development.”) is somehow worthy of being summarized as if the point was proven (“Ai can be very powerful in the right hands”)… well, it sounds like shit because it is shit. Maybe it’s ai, maybe it’s just a really rushed dude making a throwaway comment in the fediverse, and maybe it’s just a person who is confident enough in their mind that they forget they haven’t made an actually decent argument outside of their past, and concluding as if they brought that past argument forth here is eye-raising.

Considering he’s on his own instance… I’m going to bet the context is somewhere between throwaway comment and invoking past assertions without citing them.

Also I can’t really answer the question if it’s bad or not what happens to ntfy.sh since it really depends on how the maintainer is using Ai here. Whether he did test the code, and read all the generated code.

Ai in itself isn’t the problem here.

Haha. I’m not a native English speaker. But it’s not Ai generated.

I try to keep it common for general people to understand it. If you have follow up questions shoot. I have 25+ years of software engineering experience.

But my point is that developers can use Ai, Ai tools become much better for coding, as long as the developer still understands the code. Since some developers don’t even bother looking at the code anymore…