When you created your containers, did you create a “frontend” and “backend” docker network? Typically I create those two networks (or whatever name you want) and connect all my services (gitlab, Wordpress, etc) to the “backend” network then connect nginx to that same “backend” network (so it can talk to the service containers) but I also add nginx to the “frontend” network (typically of host type).

What this does is it allows you to map docker ports to host ports to that nginx container ONLY and since you have added nginx to the network that can talk to the other containers you don’t have to forward or expose any ports that are not required (3000 for gitlab) to talk from the outside world into your services. Your containers will still talk to each other through native ports but only within that “backend” network (which does not have forwarded/mapped ports).

You would want to setup your proxy hosts exactly like you have them in your post except that in your Forward Hostname you would use the container name (gitlab for example) instead of IP.

So basically it goes like this

Internet > gitlab.domain.com > DNS points to your VPS > Nginx receives requests (frontend network with mapped ports like 443:443 or 80:80) > Nginx checks proxy hosts list > forwards request to gitlab container on port 3000 (because nginx and gitlab are both in the same “backend” network) > Log in to Gitlab > Code until your fingers smoke! > Drink coffee

Hope this help!

Edit: Fix typos

It sounds like maybe you have Nginx set up but you’re not using it. Nginx is normally listening on one port.

Edit: ignore everything, just realized it’s all running on a VPS. In that case, change WordPress off port 80. NPM needs 80 and 443.

~~Assuming you have port forwarding on your router set up with 80 and 443 being forwarded to the local IP of the machine hosting NPM…

Another problem you might run into is NAT Loopback, but it all depends on your router.

So you type lemmy.domain.com (no port), it goes to DNS which points it to your home IP, it goes back through your router and gets forwarded to NPM, and NPM does the handling of which IP:PORT to serve up.

I have adguard home doing all of my DNS so to get around the NAT loopback problem I have custom DNS rewrite rules. It’s very simple in my case: *.domain.com gets directed to the local IP of NPM.

When I’m outside my home network, NAT loopback is no longer a problem and things work as they should.

Sorry for rambling, just reciting some general overview stuff that I’ve learned along the way.~~

I’m a little confused, mine is setup in the same way you described I believe and accessing the subdomain without any additional port still forwards it correctly to the destination ip:port.

As an update, I think this was a side effect of how Wordpress / Gitlab was set up, where it was expecting it to be IP:PORT, which would force a redirect to the port specifically. Using the subdomain as the setting for web url seemed to resolve my problem. Thanks for the replies from everyone as all of the advice here is still really useful!

You should not be able to access port 3000 in your scenario. The fact you can suggests that you used network_type: host for your gitlab container which has exposed it on the host’s interface and that your firewall is not filtering it.

• Block everything on the VPS public interface except 443, 80 and 8081 which should be forwarded to the NPM container.
• All your containers should use network mode “bridge” unless they explicitly require another mode for pertinent reasons.But on a VPS there’s usually not going to be a reason to do that.
• In bridge mode you can expose ports inside the container to the host with the “ports:” directive but only NPM 80, 443 and 8081 (admin interface) should be exposed that way. For everything else it’s best to use a docker network instead and connect containers to the NPM container instead, since that’s the only one that really needs to access them.

How this works:

• Regular containers expose their ports only to the NPM container on the private docker network.
• 443 on the VPS external interface gets through the firewall and forwarded to 443 on the NPM container.
• NPM looks at the domain name and proxies the connection to the appropriate host/ip container and port as you configured it. Btw it’s easier to give containers hostnames and refer to them by name than to track docker bridge IPs.
• Port 80 behaves the same way but as soon as you get Let’s Encrypt certificates and get 443 going you can close it down (in both the VPS firewall and the NPM container port mapping).
• You should also set up a domain proxy forward to the NPM admin interface on 8081 at which point you can stop forwarding/mapping that one too.

Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I’ve seen in this thread:

5 acronyms in this thread; the most compressed thread commented on today has 17 acronyms.

[Thread #198 for this sub, first seen 8th Oct 2023, 09:05] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]