Before you scream at your screen, I am aware this setup isn’t ideal, to say the least, my Self-hosting has been composed of a laptop with a usb carry with a 2.5 1tb hard drive. I recent made up my mind about getting a couple 4 tb server hdd (heard barracuda are relatively silent) to run software raid 1, since I can’t find a budget double bay carry (that I can purchase locally) I’ve decided I’ll get a couple 3.5 inch usb cases and get a splitter to run the power from just just one brick.
My question is regarding resiliency, I get occasional blackouts and low tension every now and then, a few times a year but it can be a few times in a day. I’ve never had hardware dying because of it and I don’t have a UPS, but I worry I could be risking data corruption or something swapping to this setup because of the extra power those drives will need being fed from the wall instead of the laptop (the laptop feeds the current drive over usb alone and it has a battery) which could be abruptly cut off every now and then. Right now, the worst this has caused has been having to reboot the system because it got unmounted but never had a loss of data from this.
Am I worrying for nothing? Would it be just the same? Should I just put this off until (if) I can afford the drives plus a ups? So far I’ve had my server for basically free, but I’m running out of space for family photos and I kinda have to upgrade.
Edit: Thanks a lot for all the thoughtful responses! What I’ve learnt from them so far:
- ZFS (what’s used for software RAID) takes some extra memory and might not be the best idea for a memory constrained system.
- In this case of mirrored drives, it’s better to schedule backups than to try a flimsy raid array usb abomination, didn’t even think of that as an option
- Sudden power loss is likely to corrupt files
- Following the previous item, a UPS is more important than I thought, my laptop’s battery probably saved me from more corruption than I was aware of. I might have to prioritize that over the expansion.
Learned a lot so far, thank you all so much!
I suspect this machine might be memory constrained and if so zfs might push it to its limits if it’s already close.
If it has <8G and doesn’t already have decent headroom I’d think twice about ZFS depending on how its going to be used
Didn’t know about this, it is at 8 GB of ddr3, couldn’t find a bigger stick and it doesn’t have more than one slot. I’m updating the post to address other responses. Thanks
If you consider ZFS and don’t mind having the machine offline for a day or two you could fill it up with real (backups!) or a bunch of representative fake data and run some tests/benchmarks before you fully commit. It depends a lot on how the data is structured and what you’re running on it and it’s possible it will run fine.