i love selfhosting :3

    • Coleslaw4145@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      What makes you think its 4 proxmox nodes?

      To me it looks like 3 Debian VMs (2 of them running docker containers) and 1 TrueNAS VM running in a single Proxmox node.

      • Magnum, P.I.@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        52 minutes ago

        Running everything in a VM to run it in Docker is excessive as well. It is supposed to use bare metal containers.

  • mpramann@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 hours ago

    What is your reason for running two separate Debian docker hosts with under 5 containers in total? That seems like quite the overhead? And why did you choose to install Nextcloud on your TrueNAS server?

    • RecallMadness@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Not OP. But i do the same.

      I have multiple proxmox hosts, running multiple VMs, each running containers.

      I do it so I can minimise disruption. Fixing a fault in immich doesn’t mean the house is without plex for a week.

  • DecronymB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    48 minutes ago

    Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I’ve seen in this thread:

    Fewer Letters More Letters
    HTTP Hypertext Transfer Protocol, the Web
    IP Internet Protocol
    NUC Next Unit of Computing brand of Intel small computers
    UDP User Datagram Protocol, for real-time communications

    4 acronyms in this thread; the most compressed thread commented on today has 10 acronyms.

    [Thread #270 for this comm, first seen 2nd May 2026, 08:00] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]

  • zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    16 hours ago

    You should look into container technology. No reason to have this many operating systems wasting resources

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Heh. Container mafia going “hush, don’t worry about iso27002, just one more pull, bro.”

      • zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Tell me again why a properly managed container environment (if you wanna go bonkers use Jails on FreeBSD) offers more attack surface than multiple operating systems running the exact same software.

        Just randomly mentioning ISO27x tells me exactly that you have absolutely no idea how those standards work.

      • HereIAm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 hours ago

        OP is still running 5 containers though? And why does a home server need to implement an IT security standard meant for large organisations? I hope you got an incident response policy written down, would be a shame to fail the next audit.

  • frongt@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Why do you use two separate Debian VMs plus a truenas VM running nextcloud?

    • Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Security is the first thing that comes to mind. Compartmentalization prevents or at least makes it considerably harder for compromised services to screw up all the others.

      Another thing would be that it might be easier to manage backups and snapshots.

      • jimerson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        16 hours ago

        From my understanding, it’s helpful that each VM will have its own IP so ports can be opened only on specific VMs, increasing overall security.

        • kureta@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Am I doing something wrong. All my services are grouped in docker compose files. Containers that have to communicate internally - a server and it’s db for example - are on their own private docker network. A reverse proxy has its ports 80 and 443 open and it is on an external docker network. Services that I need to access from the outside are on this network and they do not have any ports open. Except for the torrent client, which has a UDP port open.

  • renegadespork@lemmy.jelliefrontier.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Nice stack! What’s the crab logo? I don’t recognize it.

    Do you notice a massive increase in request latency (like 10x-50x) when using a CloudFlare tunnel vs connecting directly to your IP? I’ve experimented with it a few times, but it really negatively impacts QoS for me, especially with federated services (like Matrix) where there are lots of small requests.

            • not_amm@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              For me, it becomes very useful when you manage local and public services and the same time. I’m actually planning to return to use a dashboard because I added new services and devices to my stack, so now there are more IPs and domains I use for different tasks and I’m too lazy to remember/write all of them :)

    • irmadlad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Do you notice a massive increase in request latency (like 10x-50x) when using a CloudFlare tunnel

      Have not noticed that at all. I don’t run any federated services tho. Might be the difference, I don’t know.

        • Tim@lemmy.snowgoons.ro
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          That seems unlikely; trust me, there are services running behind Cloudflare tunnels that are doing more requests per second than whatever you’re hosting does in a year.

          The only times I’ve had performance problems with Cloudflare tunnels it’s been intermediate network kit that didn’t like IPv6 or didn’t like QUIC (or both). You can try disabling both in cloudflared to diagnose (at least, you used to be able to disable them/switch to HTTP/2+IPv4, it’s been a very long time since I’ve needed to so I’m just assuming it’s still an option.)

  • xSikes@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    TruNAS is a VM? I thought it preferred bare metal? I would think it would be side by side with proxmox? (Still learning and planning my setup.

    • nagaram@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I’ve got a virtualized set up to.

      Its pretty unbothered being virtualized so long as the disks are passed through. In my set up, I have the SAS board passed through and its using that.

      My reasoning is that I wanted a lot of disks space, but I couldn’t get that without just a big case in general, so I use the extra space to store GPUs for AI and encoding stuff