So you don’t want to port-forward on your home router or have Cloudflare decrypt all your traffic? Check out Towonel.

Most open source Cloudflare Tunnel alternatives involve setting up a VPS, terminating TLS there on a reverse proxy, then setting up a Wireguard tunnel to your server at home.

Towonel is different: it does not decrypt your traffic on the VPS and you can easily share one, so not every self-hoster has to buy and maintain a VPS.

Check it out!

Mastodon link: https://gts.erwanleboucher.dev/@eleboucher/statuses/01KS4YNA2SYMSP0FSKJVNJA155

  • BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Not really haha, you could say I followed a tutorial for setting up a wireguard server on a VPS, and then once I had the wireguard container running and my homelab boxes as clients, I started up an haproxy container on the VPS with network_mode: "service:wireguard" so that the wireguard container can also see my homelab boxes through the tunnel, then also added ports 80 and 443 to the wireguard container on the VPS (in addition to the 51820 for incoming wireguard connections) - that has to be on the wireguard container because using network_mode means the haproxy container piggy backs on the wireguard container’s network, then I added a simple haproxy config that listens on 80/443 on the VPSes public IP and proxies it to the appropriate box on the other side of the tunnel.

    For the wireguard config, the key seems to be using mode tcp in any backend or frontend that’s connected to port 443, so that it just proxies raw data without doing termination. With SNI, you can even proxy to different wireguard clients based on domain, because SNI exposes the domain without needing to do termination. So I do that because I have my NAS as well as a NUC connected to the wireguard network hosting different things.

    This is a stripped down version of my haproxy config:

    global
        maxconn     20000
        log         127.0.0.1 local0
        daemon
    
    defaults
        mode http
        timeout connect 10s
        timeout client 1m
        timeout server 1m
        maxconn 8000
        option tcpka
        option tcp-smart-connect
        default-server init-addr last,libc,none
    
    resolvers docker
        parse-resolv-conf
    
    frontend ingress_http
        bind :::80
        bind :80
    
        acl h_secondbox_http hdr(host) -i second.box.example.com
        use_backend secondbox_http if h_secondbox_http
    
        default_backend vault_http
    
    frontend ingress_https
        mode tcp
        bind :::443
        bind :443
        tcp-request inspect-delay 5s
        tcp-request content accept if { req_ssl_hello_type 1 }
    
        acl h_secondbox_https req_ssl_sni -i second.box.example.com
        use_backend secondbox_https if h_secondbox_https
    
        default_backend vault_https
    
    backend vault_http
        server vault_server_http 10.13.13.2:80 send-proxy-v2
    backend vault_https
        mode tcp
        server vault_server_https 10.13.13.2:443 send-proxy-v2
    
    backend secondbox_http
        server secondbox_server_http 10.13.13.3:80 send-proxy-v2
    backend secondbox_https
        mode tcp
        server secondbox_server_https 10.13.13.3:443 send-proxy-v2
    

    The way this is set up, I do have to manually enter every subdomain I want to go to my second box, but the default is to route to my main vault, which is where I host most stuff anyways.

    My docker compose on the VPS is pretty simple:

    services:
      wireguard:
        image: linuxserver/wireguard:latest
        container_name: wireguard
        restart: unless-stopped
        cap_add:
          - NET_ADMIN
          - SYS_MODULE
        environment:
          - PUID=0
          - PGID=0
          - TZ=America/New_York
          - SERVERURL=wg.example.com #optional
          - SERVERPORT=51820 #optional
          - PEERS=vault,secondbox #optional
          - PEERDNS=auto #optional
          - INTERNAL_SUBNET=10.13.13.0 #optional
          - ALLOWEDIPS=10.13.13.1/24 #optional
          - PERSISTENTKEEPALIVE_PEERS=all #optional
          - LOG_CONFS=true #optional
        volumes:
          - ./volumes/wg-config:/config
        ports:
          - 51820:51820/udp
          - 80:80/tcp
          - 443:443/tcp
          - 8090:8090/tcp
        sysctls:
          - net.ipv4.conf.all.src_valid_mark=1
    
      haproxy:
        image: haproxy:lts
        container_name: haproxy
        restart: unless-stopped
        network_mode: "service:wireguard"
        depends_on:
          - wireguard
        volumes:
          - ./volumes/haproxy-config:/usr/local/etc/haproxy
    

    Then on the local side I use the same network_mode: "service:wireguard" trick to link my traefik container to the wireguard container, that way traffic hitting ports 80/443 of the wireguard container which is on the tunnel is also seen by traefik:

    services:
      boringtun:
        image: boringtun
        build: ./boringtun-docker
        container_name: boringtun
        restart: always
        privileged: true
        cap_add:
          - NET_ADMIN
        devices:
          - "/dev/net/tun:/dev/net/tun"
        volumes:
          - "./volumes/wg-config/wg0.conf:/etc/wireguard/wg0.conf"
        logging:
          driver: "json-file"
          options:
            max-size: "400k"
            max-file: "20"
        environment:
          - INTERFACE_NAME=wg0
          - WG_SUDO=1
          - WG_QUICK_USERSPACE_IMPLEMENTATION=/app/boringtun
        entrypoint: /bin/bash
        command: -c "wg-quick up wg0 && sleep infinity"
        extra_hosts: # Allows containers to access the host machine as host.docker.internal, useful for remote access to the host through a container
          - "host.docker.internal:host-gateway"
        networks:
          - ingress
    
      traefik:
        image: traefik:v2.11
        container_name: traefik
        restart: always
        network_mode: "service:boringtun"
        depends_on:
          - boringtun
        command:
          # - "--log.level=DEBUG"
          - "--providers.docker"
          - "--entrypoints.web.address=:80"
          - "--entryPoints.web.proxyProtocol.trustedIPs=10.13.13.1"
          - "--entrypoints.websecure.address=:443"
          - "--entryPoints.websecure.proxyProtocol.trustedIPs=10.13.13.1"
          - "--entrypoints.web.http.redirections.entrypoint.to=websecure"
          - "--entrypoints.web.http.redirections.entrypoint.scheme=https"
          - "--entrypoints.web.http.redirections.entrypoint.priority=100"
          # Timeouts
          - "--entryPoints.websecure.transport.respondingTimeouts.readTimeout=0"
          - "--entryPoints.websecure.transport.respondingTimeouts.writeTimeout=0"
          - "--entryPoints.websecure.transport.respondingTimeouts.idleTimeout=0"
          - "--providers.docker.exposedByDefault=false"
          - "--providers.docker.network=ingress"
          - "--certificatesresolvers.mytlschallenge.acme.tlschallenge=true"
          - "--certificatesresolvers.mytlschallenge.acme.email=youremail@example.com"
          - "--certificatesresolvers.mytlschallenge.acme.storage=/letsencrypt/acme.json"
          - "--serversTransport.forwardingTimeouts.dialTimeout=3m"
          # - "--api.insecure=true"
          # - "--certificatesresolvers.mytlschallenge.acme.caserver=https://acme-staging-v02.api.letsencrypt.org/directory"
        environment:
          - TZ=America/New_York
        volumes:
          - ./volumes/le-data/acme.json:/letsencrypt/acme.json
          - /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock
    

    I only use boringtun on this side because I think synology doesn’t or didn’t have the kernel module for wireguard and using the userspace mode made it work for me, otherwise you could probably just use the regular wireguard container. Also note that my docker network for communicating between traefik and stuff I’m exposing is ingress, which is specified both on the boringtun container as well as passed to traefik as providers.docker.network, I think that’s needed so that traefik can figure out the container IP of the containers you’re exposing. I also haven’t migrated to traefik v3 because I’m lazy.

    Another note, there’s an annoying condition where if you reboot, it may fail to attach the traefik container to wireguard because it linked via network mode to the old container. Just doing compose down and up fixes it by recreating all the containers. But other than that which I haven’t encountered in a while it works really well. I’m not sure if that bug was fixed because I rarely reboot.