I’m thinking about buying a Raspberry Pi to start my self-hosted journey. I have three usecases in mind: Navidrome server, Jellyfin server and a Pi-hole network ad-blocking. Can a single machine (like a Raspberry Pi) run these operations simultaneously? Thanks in advance!
A lot of people saying ditch the Pi, but it’s fairly viable depending on what exactly you want from it, so long as you get one of the newer models with plenty of RAM. Simply streaming media is relatively manageable for a Pi. It will most likely run Navidrome okay, and Jellyfin will be okay if and only if media doesn’t need to be transcoded, and you MIGHT have issues with 4K, not sure. If you stream to something like a smart TV or Fire Stick, those can typically only handle certain video formats, so if your media isn’t that type, either the server transcodes it, which the probably Pi can’t do fast enough, or playback fails. Music typically doesn’t require transcoding, so that’s why I think Navidrome should be okay. Pi-Hole is manageable and is, after all, expressly designed to be run on a Pi. It can also be run on standard hardware, so while you can do it on a Pi, you don’t need one to use Pi-Hole.
Now, that said, two main concerns about a Pi. The first is that you’ll probably eventually want to host and do more, and you may run out of resources and wish you’d just gotten a cheap mini PC instead. The second is that you really should get an external HDD or something to store as much as you can on, preferably including the OS. An SD card just is not meant to handle the constant I/O that comes with being the main drive for a full computer. It’ll eventually fail, taking all the data on it with it. I think the best way to run off an external HDD has changed since I used a Pi, so some research recommended, but what I did before was flash the EXACT SAME image to the SD card and HDD, then delete the boot partition on the HDD, expand the data partition to fill the HDD, and delete the data partition off the SD card. If you use the exact same image for both, it at least used to be that the partitions keep the same UUID, so it boots from the SD card as normal, and when told to find the other partition by UUID, it finds it on the other drive and works just fine.
Do not buy a RPI for self hosting. Get a mini PC second hand. It is much much better. And to answer you question, yes you can host multiple services on a single server. Read about virtualization and start learning the ways of proxmox, also say goodbye to your loved ones :)))
Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I’ve seen in this thread:
Fewer Letters More Letters DNS Domain Name Service/System LXC Linux Containers NAS Network-Attached Storage NUC Next Unit of Computing brand of Intel small computers PiHole Network-wide ad-blocker (DNS sinkhole) RAID Redundant Array of Independent Disks for mass storage RPi Raspberry Pi brand of SBC SBC Single-Board Computer VPN Virtual Private Network
8 acronyms in this thread; the most compressed thread commented on today has 13 acronyms.
[Thread #114 for this comm, first seen 27th Sep 2026, 15:10] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]
Don’t waste your time and money on a pi for this. He a cheap mini PC. Like the types that go in the back of the secretary monitor at your dentist office. That pike of junk I’d usually much better than a pi. It even has a box and room for a hard drive.
I have like 30 different services running on the same machine.
That’s why you want to use some container solution, I use docker for simplicity.
Also raspberry pi is not great for self hosting. Any cheap x64 machine will be much more powerful for the same price, and have less compatibility issues.
Just get an oldish SFF or USFF office computer cheap somewhere. It’s generally much cheaper and allows for upgrades if ram/ssd prices ever come down. Also somewhat new Intel CPUs are quite good for transcoding.
So yourself a favor and skip the pi and look for an old server on marketplace (loud and electricity is expensive, but lots of cores) or a NUC if u want a couple servers (or multiple docker containers)
Yes yes you csn.
The old may was we would run these direct like an app on the pi.
People then came up with containers and isolated things a bit made them easy to share and configure. - dockers
Have a look for people with blogs about all the software they are running on their pi plenty of info on how.
Pi isnt the best at jellyfin server as it isnt the best at transcoding files but for direct playing without having to convert the format its enough.
Yes but you should buy 3 and cluster them
Nah. Totally impossible. Give it up.

/sarcasm if not obvious
I have a Pi 4 that is running a bunch of stuff, including AdGuard(PiHole alternative), JellyFin, Radarr, Sonarr, Lidarr, Readarr, qBitorrent and some others.
I used DietPi as the OS. Would recommend as it has an AppStore like experience, with pre-configured versions of things ready to install.
DietPi is such a game changer.
Currently running it in a VM just for PiHole, and the ease of installing anything is nice.
Define “server”:
If you mean any process that serves on the network well then of course you can.
If you mean multiple containerized stacks acting as a service then yes, you can do that too.
If you mean multiple operating systems, I’m not so sure but I can’t imagine that it’s impossible.
multiple operating systems, I’m not so sure but I can’t imagine that it’s impossible
The keyword is virtualization.
Depending on how you define multiple operating systems, you can use proxmox
Install a hypervisor and you can install as many operating systems as your hardware can support.
As other commenters have said yes you can run these depending on the Pi. Do note however if you need transcoding, A Pi is not recommended by jellyfin:
https://jellyfin.org/docs/general/administration/hardware-selection#potentially-problematic-hardware
Most Single Board Computers (SBC): Most SBCs (including the Raspberry Pi, especially the Raspberry Pi 5) are too slow to provide an acceptable Jellyfin experience as they often lack proper support for hardware acceleration. If you really want to run Jellyfin on an SBC, you may wish to consider models based on the following platforms: Rockchip RK3588 / RK3588S, Intel Core, Intel 12th gen N series
Depends on the Pi in terms of how much you can do, but yes.
I have a Pi 5, and I’m running Pi Hole, Nginx porxy manager, Jellyfin, Syncthing, Paperless NGX, and a full servarr stack (including Qbittorrent and a VPN). No issues; 4.6 gb out of 7.9gb ram in use, and no appreciable bottlenecks.
I would just caution that things like Jellyfin are a moveable feast - I am 1 user streaming content on my own to 1 device without issues at 4k. But more simultaneous users and if you start depending on transcoding your mileage may vary. So yes Jellyfin and other services will run fine, but any server can be put under pressure if it’s not adequate for the actual usage.
I would skip Jellyfin on the pi. Other than that, it’s all good.
I always see people saying the Pi is poor for Jellyfin, but I’m running it on a 5 4GB (alongside a fair few other Docker images) and haven’t encountered any really issues. I’m only streaming 1080p and never see any stuttering or bad transcoding.
That said, I do intend to go with a SFF PC in the future as I’ve pretty quickly hit the point where it’d be better, so OP I would skip the Pi as well.
Let me be a bit more specific. If you are doing a couple of light services + jellyfin, maybe you can pull it off. But if you have some critical latency sensitive applications + jellyfin, it can cause issues at random times.
Also, if you are ONLY hosting Jellyfin with no *arr stack, you should be fine. I made that mistake and my Pi went down to a crawl.
Test your services together, and based on that decide on the subset of services.








