Samsung Smart TV owners can now use Jellyfin natively, as the open-source media server is now available on the Tizen platform.

  • Merlin@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I use it through tailscale. I can still use it locally (yay). Still would like to see tailscale on tizen

    • paper_moon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Apparently they will try to connect to open networks and try to tunnel through to get internet, so I set bogus manual DNS, gateway, and ip info so it can’t connect to anything correctly.

      • HotChickenFeet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        If they’re going so far as scanning open networks & tunneling, why would they bother obeying dns gateways you specify?

  • DecronymB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I’ve seen in this thread:

    Fewer Letters More Letters
    DNS Domain Name Service/System
    IP Internet Protocol
    NAS Network-Attached Storage
    Plex Brand of media server package

    4 acronyms in this thread; the most compressed thread commented on today has 16 acronyms.

    [Thread #55 for this comm, first seen 2nd Feb 2026, 19:20] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]

  • rose56@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Great news, but still not available on mine. I have to wait. Also dev way didn’t work on mine.

  • Harvey656@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I had to practically hack my Samsung TV I order to get jellyfin on it. A little annoyed it took this long but at least its there now.

  • MehBlah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I only own one Samsung TV. Its a really smart TV. Its magnificent. It never switches input which is a good thing since I never need to. This is because it has no built in services of the so called 'smart tv’s"

  • DonutsRMeh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Omfg. I love you. 😭. I tried this very last week to make it work through their workaround and it never wanted to work out. Thank you so much bringing this up.

    • kieron115@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It’s relatively easy to restrict a smart tv to TLS/HTTPS traffic only using your router and a dns adblocker.

          • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            You have to do a lot of work. You would have to keep up on what domains it’s using (which were in the dozens four years ago for samsung), and make sure it doesn’t use some as kill switches if it finds something blocked.

            We aren’t stopping just ads, we are stopping spying, data sharing, snooping, network mapping, etc.

            • kieron115@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Yeah. To be honest on the DNS side it would probably be far easier to just do a whitelist instead, block everything except your specific service. and yeah, its a stupid amount of work. i hate smart tvs but i’ll be damned if im gonna pay extra for a streaming box =|

                • kieron115@startrek.website
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  to get something as flexible as my android tv i’d need an nvidia shield and those are going on ten years old at this point. maybe if/when they do a hardware refresh, assuming sideloading isn’t completely impossible by then.

        • kieron115@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          no it helps to block everything that isnt just netflix or whatever streaming service you use. you combine a DNS adblock along with blocking all the unused ports and it severely limits the communications. you could also add a vpn to add another layer of security. idk about jellyfin but most streaming services i know use https/443 to stream to your tv. so youre only allowing the specific service you want and only on a specific port. buncha great dns blocklists here https://github.com/hagezi/dns-blocklists, and a smart tv specific one for pihole here https://github.com/Perflyst/PiHoleBlocklist/blob/master/SmartTV.txt

          • prenatal_confusion@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Hardcoded IPS circumvent DNS blocks.

            Restricting ports doesn’t do anything since the TV isn’t running a service, it is contacting one.

            Correct me if I am wrong.

            • kieron115@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 hours ago

              Not sure if you mean hardcoded DNS IPs or hardcoded “phone home” IPs. Hardcoded DNS addresses in devices are annoying, the only way i’ve found to get around that is using destination nat rules (DNAT) which requires more than a consumer router typically. hardcoded phone home IPs would get blocked by your firewall. you’re right that most firewalls are set up by default to implicitly allow outbound traffic. you set up a rule that denies all outbound traffic from the TV, then only allow port 443 (or whatever port your streaming service uses) on the specific IP/IPs that your service uses. Here’s Netflix’s published IP info for example.

              edit also i’m fully aware it’s fucking ridiculous that we as consumers have to go through this much rigamarole. you shouldnt have to be a literal network engineer to do something as simple as have a tv that doesnt spy on you.

    • tempest@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I do? I don’t love Android TV but I only have so much time to fight to the good fight with shit.

      I would like a less smart tv but I don’t want to by a 7 year old Nvidia Shield and suffered paralysis by analysis trying to decide on on an Android TV box.

      So here we are, I use jellyfin on a smart TV

      • charles@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Out of curiosity why are you reluctant to buy a Shield?

        I was on the fence for a while but I’ve been extremely happy with it and have only run into minimal issues (and significantly less than with my smart tv before).

          • VieuxQueb@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            13 hours ago

            It pisses me off that the reason most tech get filled with ads and shit is because people want to use it but are not bothered to learn anything about it. Like input selection, they need to press one button and everything has to be setting itself up without interaction or they will complain it’s too hard.

            Then the ad company makes shit to make it seem easy but fills it up with spyware and ads. Lazy People adopt the easy way and endure the shit that comes with it while bending for more.

    • Mikelius@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Having a smart tv doesn’t mean you must use internet to utilize it. Mine is blocked from internet connectivity but connects to my media server on the local network. If anything, I prefer this so I don’t need an extra computer sitting in the living room and can instead use the same single media server my phones and computers do.

    • rudyharrelson@lemmy.radio
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      84
      ·
      1 day ago

      Not every Jellyfin user is also the server administrator. If someone sets up a server and shares that server with 5 people, most of those users aren’t concerned with the privacy implications of how they connect to the server; they just want to consume content as easily as they do with Netflix, Disney, etc.

      • kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Not every Jellyfin user is also the server administrator.

        That’s true but every Jellyfin host has to be.

    • ccunix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      19 hours ago

      We have both.

      Kodi use Jellyfin for its media library and Kodi is excellent for a lot of the TV we watch. catch Up TV has replaced the decoder for watching terrestrial TV.

      One thing that sucks in Kodi though is Arte (a franco-german channel that is a leans towards “intellectual”). For that, the LG WebOS app is much better than the Kodi add-on. Other than that 1 app, we could happily plug Kodi into digital signage panel if they weren’t stupidly expensive.

    • Grass@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      Family connect to my server with tv. If tv is in the same house everything is blocked and select things are whitelisted.

  • gjoel@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Kodi running on an (old) Nvidia Shield Pro, reading from a NAS via dlnr. This works nicely and I don’t get any quality degradation… Except for HDR+ which the shield doesn’t support and I was stupid and bought a Samsung TV, which is bad for numerous reasons, but also this one.

    And of course, we are now closing in on the decade since it was released, and still no viable replacement.

    • SidewaysHighways@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Replacement for what? kodi? you’ll pry kodi out of my charred and flayed hands! (American)

      EDIT nvm can’t be kodi. forgive me.

      but yes i love kodi

      edit edit,

      any old Chromebook can run LibreELEC!

      • irmadlad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I tried Kodi years ago when I heard about some guy getting busted at a local flea market for selling Kodi rigged appliances. I didn’t download anything, but that UI was atrocious. After about 5 minutes of tinkering around, I just uninstalled it. Probably one of the worst UI’s I’ve encountered.

        • SidewaysHighways@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          I’ve hacked mine together with a control4 system i pulled out of a dumpster, with a handheld remote it is quite navigable!

          kore app/yatze on phone or direct selection of media from home assistant, you really don’t have to see the GUI that much at all if you’d prefer not to.

          smart playlists, addons for other features.

          i think it’s a swell front-end for a media server!

      • x00z@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        As an opensource dev I don’t mind having people say this. It’s good to get feedback regardless of whether it’s a call to action or merely a suggestion. You can’t know what direction people want the project to go in otherwise.

      • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Dude no one is forcing them to work on the project, they can just ditch it if they don’t want to do it anymore. Just because it’s free people are still allowed to voice opinions on the project, sure my comment is tongue in cheek, no one cares…welcome to the internet, is this your first day?

        • Rusty Shackleford@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Just because it’s free people are still allowed to voice opinions on the project

          Just because Lemmy is free, people are allowed to voice opinions on your comment, and judge you by it. It’s my opinion that you’re an asshole, and your opinion is equally worthless.

          I wish I could go to your parents and say something like, “OK, now fix the shitty attitude on @ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com.”, but you probably got it from them in the first place.

          Are you this shitty to people who submit pull requests to your dog-shit bug-ridden open-source software repos? Do you even have anything that’s open-source that tries to solve a problem?

          • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            17 hours ago

            Are you this shitty to people who submit pull requests to your dog-shit bug-ridden open-source software repos? Do you even have anything that’s open-source that tries to solve a problem?

            Of course, obviously I am the only infallible person in the universe…scrub

            • Rusty Shackleford@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              14 hours ago

              No, your attitude towards people who provide something for free while doing no work to maintain or work on that thing is the problem and makes you very “fallible”… asshole

        • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          17 hours ago

          As my parents said:
          The tone in your voice makes the music.

          There is a significant difference between

          “I just hope the devs can now focus on improving the AppleTV/iOS watching experience”

          and

          Hopefully the devs will now fix the shitty Apple app.

        • netvor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          17 hours ago

          people are still allowed to voice opinions

          now fix the shitty client on appletv

          is not an opinion, it’s just being a jerk

          • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            16 hours ago

            You thinking I’m a jerk doesn’t change the fact that the appletv app is a burning pile of dog crap. My opinion is that they should actively work on it, the lacking quality and functionality is just fact.

      • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        21 hours ago

        My server works fine with all other clients though, except the appletv one. In the appletv app I cannot change audio language or reliably change subs. Or, technically I can, it just doesn’t select the language I actually choose, it chooses some random one. This only happens on appletv app, it works as intended on all other devices, both android, iOS, browsers and MS/Linux clients.

        • Blackmist@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          I actually had that happen on the Android one a few years ago. I’m guessing the Apple one is years behind.

        • ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Infuse works great on Apple TV. It’s the best Jellfin experience. Although infuse is free to use it requires a subscription to play all media formats, in practice not free.

                • Mobile@leminal.space
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  13 hours ago

                  Hmmmm. I wonder if you uninstall and reinstall the app, would the same page appear? I’m not near my appleTV so I can’t see if my sessions were a fluke. I’ve used it twice this last week.