Yep… couldn’t agree more. I has its uses but too many people are using it and disconnecting their brain. Going to meetings where people have used it to determine requirements, do analysis or even transform data and then don’t even review the results themselves before presenting and asking us to review them is rage-inducing. “What do you mean it has problems? Where? What’s wrong??” And there’s like 5 things I’ve spotted in 2 minutes and it’s clear they’ve not even reviewed it themselves.

This guy and his long-ass, poorly formatted AI-generated “documentation” no one asked for and then after numerous errors are pointed out… “Will you review the rest?” The audacity!! 😄

Additionally, is the other parenthetical information materially correct? If not, which points [1 thru to 7] are wrong?

This is one of the problems with relying on AI… it can produce an overwhelming amount of content with errors and inaccuracies throughout. If you don’t review and know the content yourself, you won’t know what it got wrong.

It’s genuinely rude to lazily use AI to produce such a large babble of details and then ask someone else to review it for errors when you haven’t reviewed it yourself. I know you didn’t mean it that way but that’s nonetheless the result. People are going to read your comment and be misled about this project all because they assume AI is accurate and you didn’t review its results.

Edit: Sheesh… I hadn’t even got to your shitty comments that followed. You use AI to make a low effort but highly verbose post and then get mad that the repo author won’t review it in detail for you when you can’t be arsed with reading the docs yourself.